Profiling dan pemetaan riset innovation ambidexterity melalui pendekatan bibliometrik

Authors

  • Stefanus Rumangkit Universitas Bina Nusantara
  • Mts Arief Universitas Bina Nusantara
  • Firdaus Alamsjah Universitas Bina Nusantara
  • Elidjen Universitas Bina Nusantara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37631/ebisma.v5i1.1415

Keywords:

Innovative ambidexterity, exploratory, exploitation, Innovations

Abstract

This study aims to provide a comprehensive picture of current conditions and future research potential in innovative ambidexterity research. To achieve this goal, this study uses a bibliometric approach, the data sources used are secondary data sources, where the data used is in the form of 81 research articles taken in the Scopus database. In addition, selected articles are published by well-known publishers, namely Elsevier, Inderscience Publishers, Springer, Emerald, Routledge, Cogent, and Sage Publications. The results of the co-occurrence analysis and thematic map outline various emerging research topics in its clusters. Dimanqa cluster 1 covers issues such as Construction Industry, Corporate Social Responsibility, Environmental Innovation, Finance, Functional Laterity, Hemispheric Dominance, Human Resources Management, Management Practice, Manufacturing, Microfoundation, Open Innovation, Performance, Social Capital, and Sustainability. Cluster 2 raised topics such as business development, competitiveness, digital transformation, information management, information processing, innovation performance, investment, marketing, organizational framework, performance assessment, regression analysis, social network, and sustainability development. Meanwhile, cluster 3 highlights The third cluster consists of empirical analysis, entrepreneurial orientation, exploitation, exploration, industrial performance, intellectual capital, pharmaceutical industry, strategic entrepreneuship, technological development. The fourth cluster consists of business performance, dynamic capabilities, enterprise resource management, industrial management, information analysis, knowledge management, knowledge transfer, least squares approxima, radical innovation. Meanwhile, the fifth cluster consists of connectedness, decision making, environmental dynamis, firm performance, knowledge management, technological innovation, top management team. The sixth cluster consists of absortive capacity, business process performance, exploitative innovation, exploration innovation, and Small Medium Enteprise. And, the seventh cluster consists of competitive intensity. Future research themes in the realm of innovation ambidexterity can be presented or connected with strategic entrepreneurship, exploitative innovation, digital transformation, and innovation performance.

Author Biography

Stefanus Rumangkit, Universitas Bina Nusantara

Manajemen

References

Ardito, L., Besson, E., Petruzzelli, A. M., & Gregori, G. L. (2018). The influence of production, IT, and logistics process innovations on ambidexterity performance. Business Process Management Journal, 24(5), 1271–1284. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-11-2017-0306

Ardito, L., Messeni Petruzzelli, A., Dezi, L., & Castellano, S. (2020). The influence of inbound open innovation on ambidexterity performance: Does it pay to source knowledge from supply chain stakeholders? Journal of Business Research, 119, 321–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.043

Asiaei, K., Bontis, N., Askari, M. R., Yaghoubi, M., & Barani, O. (2023). Knowledge assets, innovation ambidexterity and firm performance in knowledge-intensive companies. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(8), 2136–2161. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-04-2022-0277

Berghman, L. A. (2012). Strategic innovation in established companies: An empirical study of appropriate ambidexterity strategies. International Journal of Innovation Management, 16(01), 1250007. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919611003520

Božič, K., & Dimovski, V. (2019). Business intelligence and analytics use, innovation ambidexterity, and firm performance: A dynamic capabilities perspective. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(4), 101578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.101578

Castellano, S., Khelladi, I., & Ivanaj, S. (2021). Entrepreneurial Intensity and Firm Performance: The Role of Institutional Ambidexterity. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68(2), 350–359. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2019.2901500

Ceptureanu, S. I., Ceptureanu, E. G., & Cerqueti, R. (2022). Innovation ambidexterity and impact on the performance in IT companies: The moderating role of business experience. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 34(7), 746–759. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1918337

Chakma, R., Paul, J., & Dhir, S. (2024). Organizational Ambidexterity: A Review and Research Agenda. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3114609

Clauss, T., Kraus, S., Kallinger, F. L., Bican, P. M., Brem, A., & Kailer, N. (2021). Organizational ambidexterity and competitive advantage: The role of strategic agility in the exploration-exploitation paradox. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 6(4), 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2020.07.003

Constant, F., Calvi, R., & Johnsen, T. E. (2020). Managing tensions between exploitative and exploratory innovation through purchasing function ambidexterity. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 26(4), 100645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2020.100645

Desul, S., Mahapatra, R. K., Patra, R. K., Sethy, M., & Pandey, N. (2023). Semantic technology for cultural heritage: A bibliometric-based review. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-04-2023-0125

Farzaneh, M., Wilden, R., Afshari, L., & Mehralian, G. (2022). Dynamic capabilities and innovation ambidexterity: The roles of intellectual capital and innovation orientation. Journal of Business Research, 148, 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.030

Gupta, S. (2018). Driving digital strategy: A guide to reimagining your business. Harvard Business Review Press.

Harmancioglu, N., Sääksjärvi, M., & Hultink, E. J. (2020). Cannibalize and combine? The impact of ambidextrous innovation on organizational outcomes under market competition. Industrial Marketing Management, 85, 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.07.005

Hashem, G., Aboelmaged, M., & Ahmad, I. (2024). Proactiveness, knowledge management capability and innovation ambidexterity: An empirical examination of digital supply chain adoption. Management Decision, 62(1), 129–162. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2023-0237

Hughes, M., Hughes, P., Morgan, R. E., Hodgkinson, I. R., & Lee, Y. (2021). Strategic entrepreneurship behaviour and the innovation ambidexterity of young technology-based firms in incubators. International Small Business Journal, 39(3), 202–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242620943776

Islam, T., & Munir, S. (2023). How important strategic learning capabilities are during COVID-19? A model for innovation ambidexterity. Journal of Workplace Learning, 35(1), 35–56. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-11-2021-0144

Jöhnk, J., Ollig, P., Rövekamp, P., & Oesterle, S. (2022). Managing the complexity of digital transformation—How multiple concurrent initiatives foster hybrid ambidexterity. Electronic Markets, 32(2), 547–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00510-2

Kafetzopoulos, D. (2020). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, performance and environmental uncertainty. Business Process Management Journal, 27(3), 922–940. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-06-2020-0300

Khursheed, A., & Mustafa, F. (2024). Role of innovation ambidexterity in technology startup performance: An empirical study. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 36(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.2020235

Kollmann, T., & Stockmann, C. (2010). Antecedents of strategic ambidexterity: Effects of entrepreneurial orientation on exploratory and exploitative innovations in adolescent organisations. International Journal of Technology Management, 52(1–2), 153–174. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2010.03586

Li, Y., Chen, M., Cai, Z., & Liu, H. (2023). Online-offline channel integration and innovation ambidexterity: Roles of top management team and environmental dynamism. Journal of Business Research, 160, 113792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113792

Lu, H. T., Li, X., & Yuen, K. F. (2023). Digital transformation as an enabler of sustainability innovation and performance – Information processing and innovation ambidexterity perspectives. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 196, 122860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122860

Nobakht, M., Hejazi, S. R., Akbari, M., & Sakhdari, K. (2021). Exploring the relationship between open innovation and organisational ambidexterity: The moderating effect of entrepreneurial orientation. Innovation, 23(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2020.1758566

Nofiani, D., Indarti, N., Lukito-Budi, A. S., & Manik, H. F. G. G. (2021). The dynamics between balanced and combined ambidextrous strategies: A paradoxical affair about the effect of entrepreneurial orientation on SMEs’ performance. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 13(5), 1262–1286. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-09-2020-0331

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. International Journal of Surgery, 88, 105906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906

Scuotto, V., Arrigo, E., Candelo, E., & Nicotra, M. (2019). Ambidextrous innovation orientation effected by the digital transformation: A quantitative research on fashion SMEs. Business Process Management Journal, 26(5), 1121–1140. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-03-2019-0135

Seepana, C., Paulraj, A., & Smart, P. (2022). Relational resources for innovation ambidexterity within coopetitive relationships: The contingent role of managerial ambidexterity. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 42(12), 1969–1994. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-10-2021-0666

Tang, Y., Chen, Y.-J., Shao, Y.-F., & Cao, Q. (2022). The Impact of Sustainable Transformational Leadership on Sustainable Innovation Ambidexterity: Empirical Evidence From Green Building Industries of China. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 814690. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.814690

Xia, Q., Zhu, Q., Tan, M., & Xie, Y. (2023). A configurational analysis of innovation ambidexterity: Evidence from Chinese niche leaders. Chinese Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-01-2023-0032

Xin, C., Zheng, C., & Sun, M. (2022). Environmental innovation ambidexterity and customer relationship performance: Evidence from the manufacturing industry in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(40), 60998–61011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20284-0

Yang, J. (2021). Unleashing the dynamics of triple-A capabilities: A dynamic ambidexterity view. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 121(12), 2595–2613. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-02-2021-0086

Yoshikuni, A. C. (2024). The innovation ambidexterity enabled through business process performance and information systems strategy: An empirical study by strategy-as-practice perspective. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 33(1), 118–136. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIR.2024.135939

Yoshikuni, A. C., Dwivedi, R., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2024). Strategic knowledge, IT capabilities and innovation ambidexterity: Role of business process performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 124(2), 915–948. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-01-2023-0056

Zahoor, N., Al‐Tabbaa, O., & Khan, Z. (2023). R&D alliances and SMES post‐entry internationalization speed: The impact of alliance management capability and co‐innovation ambidexterity. Global Strategy Journal, 13(2), 315–348. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1481

Zhang, Q., & Sun, X. (2022). How incentive synergy and organizational structures shape innovation ambidexterity. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(1), 156–177. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2021-0847

Downloads

Published

2024-06-19

Issue

Vol.5, No.1 (2024): Juni 2024

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright publishing of the article shall be assigned to Entrepreneurship Bisnis Manajemen Akuntansi (E-BISMA)

 

Creative Commons License
Entrepreneurship Bisnis Manajemen Akuntansi (E-BISMA) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.