Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Topik yang dapat dipublis dalam jurnal ini mencakup teoritisi, sejarah, filosofi, spiritual, kerajaan, bangsawan, kampung, perdesaan, cagar budaya (heritage), kawasan, lanskap (landscape), dan budaya arsitektur Jawa Mataram, arsitektur lokal Indonesia dan hal-hal seputar ilmu arsitektur pada umumnya baik teoritik, rancang bangun maupun teknologi.

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Duties of Reviewers
Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Publication Ethic

Jurnal Arsitektur Pendapa is a scientific publication that contains research results in the field of architecture and built environment. This statement of ethical codes of ethics is a statement of ethical code of all parties involved in the process of publication of this scientific journal of managers, editors, bestari partners, and authors / authors. This code of ethics of scientific publication is based on the Head of LIPI Regulation No. 5 of 2014 on the Code of Ethics of Scientific Publications, which in essence upholds three ethical values in publications, namely (i) Neutrality, ie free of conflict of interest in the management of publications ; (ii) Justice, namely to authorize authors to author / authors; and (iii) Honesty, ie free from duplication, fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism (DF2P) in publication.
Journal Manager Duties and Responsibilities
1. Determining the name of the journal, scope of science, scaling, and accreditation if necessary.
2. Determine the board editor's membership.
3. Define the relationship between publishers, editors, bestari partners, and others in a contract.
4. Appreciate the things that are confidential, both for contributing researchers, authors / authors, editors, or bestari partners.
5. Implementing norms and provisions on intellectual property rights, especially copyright.
6. Review the journal policy and submit it to the author / author, editor board, bestari's partner, and reader.
7. Make code guidelines behave for editors and partners bestari.
8. Publish the journal regularly.
9. Ensure the availability of funding sources for the sustainability of journal issuance.
10. Build a network of cooperation and marketing.
11. Preparing licensing and other legality aspects.
Duties and Responsibilities of the Editor
1. Meeting the needs of readers and authors / authors,
2. Seeking continuous improvement of the quality of publications,
3. Implementing processes to ensure the quality of published papers,
4. Prioritize freedom of expression,
5. Maintaining the integrity of the author's academic record,
6. Deliver corrections, clarifications, withdrawals and apologies if necessary,
7. Responsible for the style and format of writing, while the contents and all statements in the paper is the responsibility of the author / author,
8. Actively ask the opinions of authors, readers, bestari partners, and editor board members to improve the quality of publications,
9. Encourage assessment of the journal if any findings,
10. Support initiatives to reduce research and publication errors by requesting authors to attach an Ethical Clearance form approved by the Ethical Clearance Commission,
11. Support initiatives to educate researchers about ethical publications,
12. Assessing the effect of the publishing policy on the author / author's attitudes and the bestari's partners and improving them to increase responsibility and minimize errors,
13. Have open minds to new opinions or views of others that may be contrary to personal opinion,
14. Does not defend its own opinion, author or third party which may result in a non-objective decision,
15. Encourage authors / writers, in order to make improvements to the paper to be published.
Duties and Responsibilities of Bestari Partners
1. Obtain the task of the editor to review the paper and submit the review to the editor, as a material to determine the feasibility of a paper to be published.
2. The reviewer shall not review any paper involving him, whether directly or indirectly
3. Maintain the author's privacy by not disseminating the results of corrections, suggestions, and recommendations by providing criticism, suggestions, feedback, and recommendations
4. Encourage authors / authors to make improvements to the papers
5. Reviewing the written works that have been improved in accordance with the standards that have been determined.
6. The papers are reviewed in a timely fashion according to the published style of scriptures (data collection methods, author's legality, conclusions, etc.).
Duties and Responsibilities Author / Author
1. Ensure that the list of authors / authors meets the criteria as the author / author.
2. Collectively responsible for the work and the contents of the article include methods, analysis, calculations, and details.
3. Express the origin of the resources (including funding), either directly or indirectly.
4. Explain the limitations in the study
5. Respond to comments made by the partners in a professional and timely manner.
6. Inform the editor if it will retract the paper.
7. Make a statement that the papers submitted for publication are original, have not been published anywhere in any language, and are not in the process of submitting to other publishers.